Aryan Khan’s WhatsApp chats referred to ‘bulk quantity and hard drugs’, said court’s order

0
65


NEW DELHI: The special NDPS court on Wednesday (October 20) delivered its verdict and denied bail to Shah Rukh Khan’s son Aryan Khan in the drug seizure case. After the court’s order, Aryan Khan will have to stay in the Arthur Road jail for some days more. This is the fourth time that Aryan’s bail plea in connection with the cruise ship drug bust base. 

The court denied bail to Aryan, observing that ‘on the face of it’, he was indulging in ‘illicit drug activities on a regular basis’. His WhatsApp chats also showed, prima facie, that he was in touch with drug peddlers, the court noted.

Aryan (23), was arrested with a few others on October 3 after the NCB raided a cruise ship off the Mumbai coast and claimed to have seized drugs including charas, has now moved the Bombay High Court. VV Patil, special judge for the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances (NDPS) Act cases, rejected the bail pleas of Aryan, his friend Arbaaz Merchant (26) and fashion model Munmun Dhamecha (28).

The lawyers of Aryan and Munmun moved the High Court seeking bail soon thereafter. The matter is likely to be mentioned on Thursday before Justice NW Sambre seeking urgent hearing, legal sources said.

The special NDPS Act court in its 21-page order noted that WhatsApp chats of Aryan Khan prima facie revealed that he was ‘dealing in illicit drug activities on a regular basis’ and therefore it cannot be said that he was not likely to commit a similar offence if released on bail.

It also held that Aryan knew that his friend and co-accused Arbaaz was in possession of drugs, and hence there was conscious possession even though the NCB had not found any drugs on Aryan himself. “Considering the prima facie involvement of the applicants/accused No 1 to 3 (Aryan Khan, Merchant and Dhamecha) in commission of grave and serious offence, this is not a fit case for granting bail,” the judge said in the order.

The material placed before it by the NCB showed on the face of it that section 29 of the NDPS Act, pertaining to conspiracy, was applicable, said the court. “Therefore, it is not possible to record a satisfaction at this stage that the applicants have not committed any offence under the NDPS Act,” the order said.

“These things go to show that accused No 1 (Aryan) was having knowledge of the contraband concealed by accused No 2 (Merchant) in his shoes,” it said.

“Although no contraband is found in the possession of accused No 1, six grams of charas was found in possession of accused No 2 of which accused No 1 (Aryan) was having knowledge and thus it can be said that it was in conscious possession of both the accused,” the court added.

In Aryan’s WhatsApp chats, there is reference to ‘bulk quantity and hard drugs’ and ‘there is prima facie material showing that accused No 1 was in contact with persons dealing in prohibited narcotic substances,” the order said.





Source link