Reported By: Salil Tiwari
Last Updated: April 19, 2023, 15:59 IST
The HC passed the order in a bail application moved by a rape accused. (Representational image: Shutterstock)
In the present case, the victim did not support the prosecution’s case alleging that she could not identify the person who had raped her as she had not seen the culprit’s face
The Allahabad High Court recently directed the Uttar Pradesh government to issue necessary orders/directions for recovery of the amount of compensation, if paid, in rape cases, where the victim becomes hostile during the trial and does not support the prosecution case.
Let the necessary exercise be done within a period of three months, the bench of Justice Brij Raj Singh ordered.
“Victim is the person who comes before the court and during trial, if she denies the allegation of rape and becomes hostile, there is no justification to keep the amount of compensation provided by the state government,” the single-judge bench opined.
The court stressed that “the state exchequer cannot be burdened like this” and that “there will be a possibility of misuse of the laws” if compensation is allowed to remain with the victim in such cases.
The HC passed the order in a bail application moved by a rape accused.
The accused, Jeetan Lodh alias Jitendra, was facing prosecution under sections 376, 452, and 506 of IPC, and section 3/4 of the POCSO Act last year in the Unnao district of Uttar Pradesh.
He sought bail on the grounds that the victim, in her cross-examination during the trial, had not supported the prosecution case.
The counsel for the accused apprised the HC that the victim had deposed before the trial court that she could not identify the person who committed rape against her as she had not seen the face of her rapist.
The counsel further claimed that the victim had totally denied the version of FIR as well as the version of her statements recorded under section 164 of CrPC before the trial court.
Moreover, he informed the high court that the brother of the victim, who was the complainant in the case, had also not supported the prosecution case and he had alleged that some other person had written the FIR.
The court took note of the contentions raised and opined that since the victim herself had not supported the prosecution case, therefore, it was a fit case for bail.
However, before the court could part with the matter, Additional Government Advocate Rajesh Kumar Singh argued that in rape cases as well as cases of sexual offences against minors, the victim and her family are provided financial assistance and since in the present case, the victim had turned hostile, therefore, the compensation provided to her should be recovered.
As per the latest government order dated June 14, 2016, pertaining to the issue, compensation of Rs 3 lakh is given to rape victims in the state.
Read all the Latest India News here
